Comments on: MoReq2010 – Records Management Rant http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/de/moreq2010-records-management-rant/2187 Compliance - Electronic Records - ECM - DMS - BPM - SaaS Fri, 11 May 2012 23:15:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Ishita http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/de/moreq2010-records-management-rant/2187/comment-page-1/#comment-5410 Ishita Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:21:27 +0000 http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=2187#comment-5410 The DLM Forum announced In March 2010, that it has signed a contract for the development of a new edition of MoReq, to be known MoReq2010. MoReq2010 developed on an open, consultative basis. The DLM Forum announced In March 2010, that it has signed a contract for the development of a new edition of MoReq, to be known MoReq2010.
MoReq2010 developed on an open, consultative basis.

]]> By: Tweets that mention MoReq2010 – Records Management Rant | SAPERION Blog -- Topsy.com http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/de/moreq2010-records-management-rant/2187/comment-page-1/#comment-5392 Tweets that mention MoReq2010 – Records Management Rant | SAPERION Blog -- Topsy.com Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:52:12 +0000 http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=2187#comment-5392 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jesse Wilkins, Ulrich Kampffmeyer. Ulrich Kampffmeyer said: [EN] MoReq2010 – Records Management Rant | SAPERION Blog | Volker John | 15.07.2010 http://icio.us/vk0bs5 [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jesse Wilkins, Ulrich Kampffmeyer. Ulrich Kampffmeyer said: [EN] MoReq2010 – Records Management Rant | SAPERION Blog | Volker John | 15.07.2010 http://icio.us/vk0bs5 [...]

]]> By: Ulrich Kampffmeyer http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/de/moreq2010-records-management-rant/2187/comment-page-1/#comment-5391 Ulrich Kampffmeyer Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:58:06 +0000 http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=2187#comment-5391 Hello Volker, sitting next to you at the DLM Forum conference in Barcelona, I could see and feel you shaking your head. It is a pitty that the DLM community did not put any emphasis in the dissemination of MoReq2 first but launched a new initiative for MoReq2010. Marc Fresko had proposed to use MoReq2 until MoReq2010 will be available. Yes, there are parts of MoReq2 which need re-design or "re-interpretation", but now all activities for MoReqe have stopped and we see nothing but a big gap. In parallel the ISA has started an initiative to make their standards for records management an ISO standard, although these documents do not have the quality and completeness like MoReq2. As member of the MGB MoReq Governance Board I want to encourage you to take active part in the development of MoReq2010 and add value to the the discussion portal: http://contribute2moreq.eu/. Only if those who are engaged in Records Management join in, MoReq will have a chance in the future. Kind regards, Ulrich Kampffmeyer Hello Volker, sitting next to you at the DLM Forum conference in Barcelona, I could see and feel you shaking your head. It is a pitty that the DLM community did not put any emphasis in the dissemination of MoReq2 first but launched a new initiative for MoReq2010. Marc Fresko had proposed to use MoReq2 until MoReq2010 will be available. Yes, there are parts of MoReq2 which need re-design or “re-interpretation”, but now all activities for MoReqe have stopped and we see nothing but a big gap. In parallel the ISA has started an initiative to make their standards for records management an ISO standard, although these documents do not have the quality and completeness like MoReq2.
As member of the MGB MoReq Governance Board I want to encourage you to take active part in the development of MoReq2010 and add value to the the discussion portal: http://contribute2moreq.eu/.
Only if those who are engaged in Records Management join in, MoReq will have a chance in the future.

Kind regards,

Ulrich Kampffmeyer

]]> By: Dr. Martin Bartonitz http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/de/moreq2010-records-management-rant/2187/comment-page-1/#comment-5368 Dr. Martin Bartonitz Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:33:48 +0000 http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=2187#comment-5368 Immerhin hatte der rein Deutschsprachige Standard DOMEA es schon etwas weiter gebracht. Ich kann mich erinnern, dass für die Version 1 immerhin 2 handvoll Hersteller aus DACH zertifiziert waren. Die Version 2 hatten aber auch schon weniger mitgemacht, aber auch hier geht es wohl bergab mit dem RM-Interesse der Hersteller. Immerhin hatte der rein Deutschsprachige Standard DOMEA es schon etwas weiter gebracht. Ich kann mich erinnern, dass für die Version 1 immerhin 2 handvoll Hersteller aus DACH zertifiziert waren. Die Version 2 hatten aber auch schon weniger mitgemacht, aber auch hier geht es wohl bergab mit dem RM-Interesse der Hersteller.

]]>