<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SAPERION Blog &#187; Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/tag/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saperionblog.com</link>
	<description>COMPLIANCE - SaaS - ECM - BPM - CMIS - SCRUM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:45:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<link rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" type="application/json" href="http://friendfeed.com/api/public-sup.json#ae70a1f9c8"/>		<item>
		<title>Vom Status Quo der Standards im Geschäftsprozessmanagement</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/vom-status-quo-der-standards-im-geschaftsprozessmanagement-und-der-wende-in-deutschland/5428</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/vom-status-quo-der-standards-im-geschaftsprozessmanagement-und-der-wende-in-deutschland/5428#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 23:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Martin Bartonitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deutsch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signavio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=5428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ich war vorgestern zum 4. Mal meine beiden Vorträge Standardisierungsbestrebungen im Geschäftsprozessmanagement und Modellierung mit SAPERION ECM Workflow vor Studenten der Falkutät für Wirtschaftsinformatik an der Universität Leipzig halten. Prof. R. Rainer Alt und sein Mitarbeiter Christian Hrach hatte mich vor drei Jahren das erste Mal eingeladen, u.a. weil er meine Artikel, die ich über [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/vom-status-quo-der-standards-im-geschaftsprozessmanagement-und-der-wende-in-deutschland/5428/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wann ist meine Archivierung von Dokumenten mit Kreditkartendaten compliant?</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/wann-ist-meine-archivierung-von-dokumenten-mit-kreditkartendaten-compliant/5118</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/wann-ist-meine-archivierung-von-dokumenten-mit-kreditkartendaten-compliant/5118#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beate Keller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deutsch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[records management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archivierung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freudenberg IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=5118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Der PCI-Datensicherheitsstandard (DSS) wurde entwickelt, um die Datensicherheit von Karteninhabern zu verbessern und die umfassende Akzeptanz einheitlicher Datensicherheitsmaßnahmen auf der ganzen Welt zu vereinfachen. Dieser liefert grundlegende technische und betriebliche Anforderungen zum Schutz von Karteninhaberdaten. Der PCI-DSS gilt für alle Einrichtungen, die an der Verarbeitung von Zahlungskarten beteiligt sind – einschließlich Vertragsunternehmen, EDV-Dienstleistern, abrechnenden Stellen, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/wann-ist-meine-archivierung-von-dokumenten-mit-kreditkartendaten-compliant/5118/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our seventh wish to BPMN 2.1 in respect of process execution &#8211; technical grouping activity</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-seventh-wish-to-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-of-process-execution-technical-grouping-activity/3293</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-seventh-wish-to-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-of-process-execution-technical-grouping-activity/3293#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 07:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Martin Bartonitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN Request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=3293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is is a simple one but just helpful. Last week I followed a discussion  about how to model in BPMN if there are more than one tasks to be done by the user who started with. The recommandation was to not use one human activity and write &#8220;do this and that and &#8230;&#8221;. Just [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-seventh-wish-to-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-of-process-execution-technical-grouping-activity/3293/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Über unsere meistgelesenen Beiträge: Compliance, Personalausweis und die Akzeptanz der BPMN</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/uber-unsere-meistgelesenen-beitrage-compliance-personalausweis-und-die-akzeptanz-der-bpmn/3279</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/uber-unsere-meistgelesenen-beitrage-compliance-personalausweis-und-die-akzeptanz-der-bpmn/3279#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 08:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Martin Bartonitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deutsch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signavio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=3279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In dieser Woche ist inzwischen unser vierter Artikel über die tausender Marke der Lesungen gesprungen: Compliance ist keine Mode sondern hat eine lange Tradition. Er geht u.a. auf das bisher geringe Kontrollieren der Einhaltung von Regeln gerade im Mittelstand ein. In der letzten Woche ist unser aktueller Dauerbrenner über die 6.000er Marke gesprungen: Ich habe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/uber-unsere-meistgelesenen-beitrage-compliance-personalausweis-und-die-akzeptanz-der-bpmn/3279/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our sixth wish to BPMN 2.1 in respect to execution &#8211; behaviors during forwarding</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-sixth-wish-to-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-to-execution-behaviors-during-forwarding/3271</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-sixth-wish-to-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-to-execution-behaviors-during-forwarding/3271#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Martin Bartonitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN Request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=3271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, this wish is a bit more for discussing how to model human-centric workflow features which are mostly needed in the context of forwarding an process from on human task to the next one. I choosed an example where some receivers ot the human task named &#8220;approve Credit Enquiry&#8221; should parallely check and forward &#8220;manually&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-sixth-wish-to-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-to-execution-behaviors-during-forwarding/3271/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WfMC is planning the next update of XPDL in respect to BPMN 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/wfmc-is-planning-the-next-update-of-xpdl-in-respect-to-bpmn-2-0/3255</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/wfmc-is-planning-the-next-update-of-xpdl-in-respect-to-bpmn-2-0/3255#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Martin Bartonitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WfMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPDL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=3255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are all waiting for the offical release of BPMN 2.0 by the OMG specification group. Now the Workflow Management Coalition ( WfMC) hosts the annual global user group event for implementers, developers and practitioners of the XML Process Definition Language for BPM Notation (XPDL4BPMN). Held December 2-3, 2010 at the Fujitsu corporate facility in Santa [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/wfmc-is-planning-the-next-update-of-xpdl-in-respect-to-bpmn-2-0/3255/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Noch ein grüßendes Murmeltier: Gartners jährlicher Blick in die Kristallkugel zu Trends im BPM &#8211; 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/noch-ein-grusendes-murmeltier-gartners-jahrlicher-blick-in-die-kristallkugel-zu-trends-im-bpm-2010/3201</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/noch-ein-grusendes-murmeltier-gartners-jahrlicher-blick-in-die-kristallkugel-zu-trends-im-bpm-2010/3201#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 23:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Martin Bartonitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deutsch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=3201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ich habe mir gerade die diesjährige Gartner-Ausgabe zum BPM Hype Cycle angeschaut und möchte kurz die wichtigesten Erkenntnisse zu den erkannten Trendes zusammen fassen. Vorab noch die Einführung eines neuen Akronyms: Gartner führt neben dem BPMS noch das BPMT ein. Während S für Suite steht, steht T für Technology (kommt mir irgenwie bekannt vor: DRT [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/noch-ein-grusendes-murmeltier-gartners-jahrlicher-blick-in-die-kristallkugel-zu-trends-im-bpm-2010/3201/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our first experiences with BPMN 2.0 in respect to human-centric workflow execution</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-first-experiences-with-bpmn-2-0-in-respect-to-human-centric-workflow/3197</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-first-experiences-with-bpmn-2-0-in-respect-to-human-centric-workflow/3197#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 16:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Martin Bartonitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN Request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signavio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=3197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Born in the beginning of this millennium BPMN &#8211; Business Process Modeling and Notation &#8211; became the world wide standard for graphical process modeling in the last two years. The new Version 2.0 which will be released in near time begins to close the gap in the BPM Round-Trip Engineering.  What has been missed so [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-first-experiences-with-bpmn-2-0-in-respect-to-human-centric-workflow/3197/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rechnungen ohne Signatur: ein Durchbruch für Pragmatismus</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/rechnungen-ohne-signatur-ein-durchbruch-fur-pragmatismus/3178</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/rechnungen-ohne-signatur-ein-durchbruch-fur-pragmatismus/3178#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 18:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Axel Kroll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deutsch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elektronische Rechnung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elektronische Signature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=3178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Endlich ist es soweit: tatsächlich eine Steuererleichterung, die den Staat nichts kostet, und Unternehmen enorm Geld spart.Man hat fast den Eindruck, hier wäre das Perpetuum Mobile erfunden worden, oder Weihnachten wäre jetzt schon im November (und zwar nicht nur in den Läden). Tatsächlich geht es aber darum, daß der Staat nunmehr, kaum 30 Jahre nach [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/rechnungen-ohne-signatur-ein-durchbruch-fur-pragmatismus/3178/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our fifth wish for BPMN 2.1 &#8211; context menu offerings</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-fifth-wish-for-bpmn-2-1-context-menu-offerings/3157</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-fifth-wish-for-bpmn-2-1-context-menu-offerings/3157#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Martin Bartonitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN Request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signavio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=3157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is our fifth wish in respect to missing attributes of an human task. Depending on the culture of a company or the importance of a workflow item the user may be or not possible to call several functions, e.g.: put the task into the resubmission tray until a defined date show the process history [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-fifth-wish-for-bpmn-2-1-context-menu-offerings/3157/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our forth wish for BPMN 2.1 in respect to process execution &#8211; rework of a task</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-forth-wish-for-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-to-process-execution-rework-of-a-task/3128</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-forth-wish-for-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-to-process-execution-rework-of-a-task/3128#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 06:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Martin Bartonitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN Request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signavio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=3128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our next wish belongs a simple functionality, but helps again to reduce programming effort and a source of error. Working on business cases there is often the situation that a task is addressed to an organisational unit and somebody takes the task over. The flow goes on, but due to some missing things it may [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-forth-wish-for-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-to-process-execution-rework-of-a-task/3128/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our third wish to BPMN 2.1 in respect to process execution &#8211; destribution procedure</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-third-wish-to-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-to-process-execution-destribution-procedure/3053</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-third-wish-to-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-to-process-execution-destribution-procedure/3053#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Martin Bartonitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN Request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signavio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=3053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here comes our third wish (first and second one) for the human-centric process behavior missed in BPMN 2.0. In BPMN you can place an human task into a lane, which is named e.g. Sales. During runtime somebody of the organisational unit Sales (attribute = performer) should do the work. In reality there are several possibilities [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-third-wish-to-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-to-process-execution-destribution-procedure/3053/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our second wish to BPMN 2.1 in respect to process execution &#8211; human decision</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-second-wish-to-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-to-process-execution-human-decision/3021</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-second-wish-to-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-to-process-execution-human-decision/3021#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Martin Bartonitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN Request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signavio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=3021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In every process there are decision points. Conditions can be proved by the process engine by evaluating formulars defined on conditional sequence flows. So the corresponding parameters must be set within processing the task before (diagramm taken from discussion post of Keith Swenson). We have learned that in the most cases the user should decide [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-second-wish-to-bpmn-2-1-in-respect-to-process-execution-human-decision/3021/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to model BPMN for dynamic process execution</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/how-to-model-bpmn-for-dynamic-process-execution/2996</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/how-to-model-bpmn-for-dynamic-process-execution/2996#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Martin Bartonitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signavio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=2996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In many cases processes follow complex rules. So the graphical structure of a process may me simple. But to decide who should take over a task can be very different. I will show this behavior on the basis of a typical invoice approval process and how to model it in BPMN. BPMN allows to use [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/how-to-model-bpmn-for-dynamic-process-execution/2996/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our first wish for BPMN 2.1 in respect to process execution &#8211; Organisational Structure Model</title>
		<link>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-first-wish-for-bpmn-2-1-organisational-structure-model/2976</link>
		<comments>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-first-wish-for-bpmn-2-1-organisational-structure-model/2976#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 22:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Martin Bartonitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPMN Request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signavio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saperionblog.com/?p=2976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BPMN 2.0 will be released in then next days of weeks. But we have just some wishes for the next release, may be named 2.1. These wishes are resulting from our early experiences with the interoperability of BPMN 2.0. We have started to import an external process definition based on the XML-based serialisation of BPMN [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.saperionblog.com/lang/en/our-first-wish-for-bpmn-2-1-organisational-structure-model/2976/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

